In 1999, the American Psychological Association and the United States Congress both issued statements declaring that sexual relations between children and adults, are abusive, exploitive, reprehensible and properly punishable by law.1 Both organizations define a child to include adolescents under 18 years of age.2,3
Eight years later, shortly after posting the intial results of its research on US sex laws in 2007, SOL Research was contacted by two young women complaining about dishonest and abusive treatment by the legal system when they were teenagers in relationships with adult men. Amber had recently turned 18 and asked for help contacting her boyfriend in prison, who had been 18 when she was 13. She said about her case:
It was definitely all blown out of proportion and twisted around to make it look like Terry abused me, or took advantage of me.
While she was still 17, Jennifer wrote about how shed been treated when she was found at 14 with a 34-year-old man shed met online.
Some cops came to see me. One of them got in my face, asking me if I was going to cry like a little juvenile. They kept threatening to get me into trouble for being a liar.
Both of these young women disagree strongly with what the APA and Congress say about child sexual abuse. At 13 and 14 years old, they had both been well within the bounds of what the APA and Congress meant by children. Yet both women spoke of the men involved as important in their lives. They spoke of having deep feelings for them. And they were both adamant that they had never been abused by the men, but rather were abused by the police and the courts in pursuit of those men.
Another person who has expressed strong disagreement is gay activist and columnist Dan Savage. Shortly after Congress issued its resolution, he wrote:
My experience is not at all uncommon, especially among men, and its absurd to think that what I did at 15 (and what was done to me) would even be considered child sexual abuse, or lumped together with the incestuous rape of a five-year-old girl.
The comments of Amber, Jennifer, and Savage suggest that something is amiss. These three individuals have found that their private, intimate experiences bring them into conflict with two of the worlds most prominent organizations, which presumably both exist for the purpose of promoting and sustaining their well-being, especially when they were youngsters. But at least for these three individuals, the pronouncements of the APA and Congress, instead of contributing to their well-being, have become a source of angst and consternation.
SOL Research conceived the Consenting Juveniles study to investigate whether there are more people like Amber, Jennifer, and Dan Savage and, if so, to listen to what they have to say. Upon finding a good number of people who enjoyed physical intimacy as juveniles with someone older and hold it to be a positive experience in their lives, it seemed important that their voices be heard alongside those of the APA and Congress. That is the purpose of the Consenting Juveniles website.
Marshall Burns is a physicist and technology entrepreneur who pioneered in the development of personal computers in the 1980s and 3D printers in the 90s. His career forte is the analysis and interpretation of complex data, which he learned to do in his PhD research on quantum chaos. In 2007, Burns focus shifted from technology to human issues, which led to his starting SOL Research.
For more on Burns background, see his personal website at MBurns.com.
Burns is served by a world-class team of advisors with expertise in fields relevant to the work of SOL Research.
- Jeffrey Douglas is a criminal defense attorney who started his career in 1982 by representing Virginia McMartin in the infamous McMartin preschool child molestation case. He also serves as the chairman of the board of the Free Speech Coalition.
- Charlene Steen is a retired psychologist who served on Californias panel that evaluates prisoners designated as sexually violent predators. She is the author of four books and serves on the board of directors of the California chapter of Reform Sex Offender Laws.
The Consenting Juveniles research is endorsed by a number of world-class psychologists. Click on the thumbnail image to read the original letter.
Michael Bailey (Wikipedia) is a professor and former chair of psychology at Northwestern University. He is best known for his work on the influence of biology on sexual orientation and gender nonconformity.
Elaine Hatfield (Wikipedia) is a professor and former chair of psychology at the University of Hawaii and former president of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex (SSSS). She has received the Alfred C. Kinsey Award from SSSS and and the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Association for Psychological Science. She is best known for her pioneering work on the scientific study of passionate love and sexual desire.
Although not a psychologist himself, California state senator John Vasconcellos (Wikipedia) dedicated his career to bringing principles of psychology into play in politics. In the California Assembly, Vasconcellos chaired the Select Committee on Ethics. In the Senate, he served as chair of the Public Safety, Education, and Economic Development committees.
In the year before his death, Vasconcellos expressed an intention to write a letter of endorsement for the Consenting Juveniles research. The linked file shows two e-mails from him about that.
Winston Wilde (Wikipedia) is a licensed psychotherapist who operates the Desert Center for Sexuality Awareness, a sexual health clinic that collaborates with the local health department to provide its Sex Education Enhancing Recovery program. He is a former regional president of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
A method will be provided here soon to allow interested parties to support the Consenting Juveniles research.